A
Different Approach to Fixing Failing Schools
In
this Education Week article, Garrison
Walters (South Carolina Higher Education Foundation) says that when the 1983 A Nation at Risk report sounded the
alarm that U.S. schools were succumbing to a rising tide of mediocrity, we
called in our best management experts to fix the problem. “After a generation
of tremendous effort and expense, we’re in many respects worse off than when we
started,” says Walters. “The track record is so bad our experts are frantically
rummaging at the bottom of the management toolbox to see what’s left. All they
can find is ranking teachers and firing the lowest-scoring ones. This, plus
endless testing, is the accountability agenda.”
Such
approaches are the exact opposite of the teachings of management guru W.
Edwards Deming, who helped transform companies that had been churning out
shoddy cars and appliances in the 1950s and 1960s. “Deming believed that data
were important,” says Walters, “but didn’t worship numbers; rather, he
emphasized that people’s attitudes were the key. He had complete contempt for
management strategies that gave high priority to things like pruning bad
workers and only evaluating quality at the end of the line (think high-stakes
testing).”
Rather
than trying to “fix” schools through questionable management strategies,
Walters believes we need to focus on a deeper problem: the attitudes some
Americans have about schooling. “Studies of international education,” he says,
“as well as those contrasting different ethnic groups, demonstrate that an
educationally positive surrounding culture gives young students the conviction
that learning is essential for success in life, as well as the belief that,
with appropriate effort, everyone can succeed.”
Walters
cites a study in the United Kingdom that sought to explain why low-income white
students had the lowest achievement of all subgroups. Of the ten major barriers
to success, eight were psychological. These stood out:
No comments:
Post a Comment